Compatibility
Technical screen
Compare material type, condition, separability, evidence and the recipient’s stated criteria.
Methodology
Show the evidence, the uncertainty and the status of the outcome.
RubblePass is designed to stop an early estimate, a routing scenario and a completed handoff from being presented as if they were the same thing.
The methodology supports transparent decisions. It does not replace a hazardous-material survey, structural assessment, laboratory, permit, contract or official waste record.
Evidence levels
A stronger level requires a stronger record.
The level belongs to a specific claim or material batch. It is not a blanket certification of the building, material or organization.
- 01
L0 · Preliminary
A field observation, model input or unreviewed source starts the record. It is useful for scoping, not a final claim.
Source identified - 02
L1 · Document checked
Relevant drawings, schedules, records or comparable documents have been reviewed and linked.
Document basis - 03
L2 · Professional or laboratory evidence
A relevant qualified review, test or specialist record supports the scoped claim.
Human evidence gate - 04
L3 · Custody verified
Collection, receipt, measured quantity and final acceptance evidence close the material handoff.
Outcome record
Quantity uncertainty
Use ranges before false precision.
The prototype uses three planning values to keep uncertainty visible. P10 is a lower planning estimate, P50 is the central estimate and P90 is an upper planning estimate. The exact interpretation depends on the stated model and inputs; these labels must never be used without that context.
P10Lower planning estimate
P50Central planning estimate
P90Upper planning estimate
Decision method
A route is an option until its constraints are resolved.
Fail safely
Constraint screen
Retain suspected hazards, unknown ownership, unavailable tests, programme and logistics limits as visible blockers.
Decision support
Scenario comparison
Compare feasible reuse, recycling and disposal routes using disclosed inputs and boundaries.
Impact status
Projected, reserved and verified are separate states.
01
Projected
A scenario based on estimated quantities, route assumptions and published or supplied factors.
02
Reserved
A participant has recorded an intention or conditional commitment, but the physical outcome is incomplete.
03
Verified
Custody, measured quantity, receipt and final acceptance records support the completed outcome.
Climate and value scenarios
Make every consequential assumption inspectable.
Climate scenario
A scenario may compare route-specific emission factors across a defined boundary. The record should identify the quantity status, baseline route, proposed route, source and version of each factor, transport assumption, exclusions and whether the route occurred.
Commercial scenario
A value scenario may compare avoided disposal, processing, transport and potential material value. It remains illustrative until the relevant quotations, contracts, measured quantities, invoices and payments exist.
Start with evidence
Review the method against a real decision brief.
A useful validation names the material claim, source evidence, uncertainty, reviewer, route constraints and outcome record before choosing a headline measure.